Putin’s Analogy : Is this a fallacy?
Historical archive only. New interaction is disabled.
Original Question
From a recent article:
“ President Vladimir Putin insisted Russia's homegrown coronavirus vaccine was as “reliable as a Kalashnikov assault rifle”…
Leave it to a rabid strongman to draw such an absurd analogy, but I was wondering if this might entail a fallacy? Vaccine = Kalashnikov? ( False analogy? )
Comments on Question
Answers
3I doubt Putin is making an argument. It's just a statement of opinion (and probably a way of hyping up his vaccine).
It could be argued his statement is logically fallacious. The fallacy would be weak analogy. Vaccines have little in common with assault rifles.
Of course, President Putin is trying to be persuasive. That is, his rhetoric is less logos and more pathos. However, Scott Adams has argued that analogies are terrible for persuasion for just this reason: "Analogies are good tools for explaining a concept to someone for the first time," he writes. "But because analogies are imperfect they are the worst way to persuade. All discussions that involve analogies devolve into arguments about the quality of the analogy, not the underlying situation."
So it seems Putin fails here at both logic and persuasion.
Seems like more of an opinion. Red cars are better than blue cars. Red cars are has reliable has Roberts pluming. You can set your watch to .........
Master Logical Fallacies Online
Take the Virversity course and sharpen your reasoning skills with structured lessons.
View Online Course
It’s a simile in the service of an analogy, so more a rhetorical device than a logical fallacy, true if the reliability of the Sputnik vaccine is comparable to the legendary reliability of the Kalishnikov, which seems difficult to quantify. I’m not sure the vaccine would work as well as a Kalishnikov would if both were used in battlefield conditions for a month. As a simile it’s also a metaphor; as such a “shot” from either would not be mixed. Putinese hyperbole?