Right and Wrong
Historical archive only. New interaction is disabled.
Original Question
Answers
1This can be seen as the Missing Data Fallacy : Refusing to admit ignorance to the hypothesis and/or the conclusion, but insisting that your ignorance has to do with missing data that validate both the hypothesis and conclusion.
P1: The Bible is morally perfect.
P2: Rape is endorsed in the Bible.
C. Rape must have been the perfect act given the situation.
Note that we can't even begin to explain WHY rape was "perfect," but we simply assert that it "must have been" and cite some missing data (some information we don't have.) We can use this same flawed reason to demonstrate the opposite:
P1: The Bible is perfectly evil (i.e., *everything* in the bible is wrong and evil)
P2: The Bible endorses being kind to others.
C. Being kind to other must be the most evil thing possible—we just are incapable of seeing it.
When we disregard evidence and stick with a conclusion that contradicts the evidence based on some hypothetical unknown reason, we are engaged in some seriously flawed (and dangerous) reasoning.
Master Logical Fallacies Online
Take the Virversity course and sharpen your reasoning skills with structured lessons.
View Online Course