← Back to archive

Robison Crusoe Fallacy

Historical archive only. New interaction is disabled.

Original Question

I have come across the Robinson Crusoe Fallacy as an explanation about why some political divisions are so strong today.  Is there a good reference for discussion of this I can study?

Answers

2
Well buckle up, because we've got a one-way ticket to Fallacy Island! The Robinson Crusoe Fallacy (which I'm tempted to call the 'Marooned-with-only-a-Friday-to-Chat-with' Fallacy) assumes an individual can exist, function, and thrive entirely by themselves, like ol' Crusoe in the classic tale (though, even he couldn't fully manage it). This overlooks the reality that man is a social animal, dependent on community, cooperation, and interpersonal relationships for survival.

I can see why you'd equate this with political divisions. It's easy to isolate ourselves in our beliefs and forget how deeply interconnected and interdependent we are, just like Crusoe had to learn the hard way.

Regarding a further study reference, unfortunately, Robinson Crusoe didn't leave behind a bibliography. But you might find solace in delving into discussions about individualism, collectivism, and the intricacies of social networks in politics. Search for works on political individualism and social interdependence, and you should find a trove of books and scholarly articles. Just remember to send a smoke signal if you need rescuing from a sea of academic jargon!

From what it sounds like, Robinson Crusoe Fallacy is just another framing of the naturalistic fallacy .

As for political divisions.. well, past a point it falls down to fundamental differences in certain beliefs. Not everyone subscribes to ideas of universal human rights, for instance.

Book

Want the full book?

Get the complete guide to logical fallacies by Bo Bennett.

Buy the Book

Master Logical Fallacies Online

Take the Virversity course and sharpen your reasoning skills with structured lessons.

View Online Course