Several common arguments from the protests

After the protests kicked off, there have been a lot of discussion on what to do with the issues that plague the US, and some of them I found a bit... dubious. Especially when it comes to police reform, police abolition/divestment, ways of protesting and farcial attacks on BLM itself for COVID 19.

Here is common argument number 1 (police abolition):

X: Police and the concept of policing is inherently violent, broken and systematically rotten. It cannot be ever be fixed.

Y: We believe that police is inherently violent and the recent unrest is caused by police. Therefore, to remove the violence, we must abolish the police entirely.

Z: If we abolish tbe police as a concept entirely, the world will become more peaceful because state endorsed violence given to cops will be no more.

Argument 2 (protesters):

X: Peaceful protesters dont carry masks, backpacks, water bottles or other riot gear to protests. They dont loot either.

Y: If they brought these items, or weapons such as a crowbar or other things. They are not a protester, they are criminals looking for oppotunity.

Argument 3 (BLM and COVID)

X: We know that big crowds are triggers for a second wave for COVID 19.

Y: Black Lives Matter has tens of thousands of people marching in the streets.

Z: Therefore, Black Lives Matter will be to blame for a second wave of COVID-19.

And finally, argument 4 (attacks on protests because covid):

Person 1: These BLM protests are bad for me and everyone else.

Person 2: Why?

Person 1: Because they broke the rules and I didn't! They are disrespeting everyone who followed the rules and sacrified so much during these times? Theyre selfish, reckless and self indulgent!

Person 2: Clearly, they believe that their right to value their human lives and rights outweighs the risk of catching the virus? That may be why they go out and protest.

Person 1: I dont care, they are still committing a double standard and they are all bad.

Phew, long one. Any fallacies?