← Back to archive

Distorting words (Is this strawman?)

Historical archive only. New interaction is disabled.

Original Question

What's wrong in the following dialog?


Ellen:-This morning, you called me a  cunt, didn't you? You all heard that, right?
James:-Mike, would you like to weigh in?... Because I never called you like that Ellen. What happened is that yesterday when I saw you being so friendly with Mike I said 'Has she no dignity at all? Mike was the one who was saying she's a little cunt and now she's being THAT friendly to him?'... 
And you accuse ME of calling you names?
Ellen: I don't care what Mike said because I didn't hear Mike calling me that. What matters is that this morning you called me a cunt.

This is taken from the show Survivor, where the audience decides who stays and who's leaving, so Ellen has a selfish motive behind trying to make James look bad. 

This reminds of contextomy
Could it also be strawman fallacy ? After all, Ellen clearly distorts what James said and attacks the distorted version.
Could it be something else?

Answers

2

This is strawman fallacy , and  strawman fallacy is a kind of contextomy , so this is contextomy too.
In her answer, on the other hand, argument by repetition and selective attention also appear.

Any misrepresentation is a strawman but they may be some cognitive bias here that she will not accept James answer.

Book

Want the full book?

Get the complete guide to logical fallacies by Bo Bennett.

Buy the Book

Master Logical Fallacies Online

Take the Virversity course and sharpen your reasoning skills with structured lessons.

View Online Course